HENRY MATTHEW ALT

TO GIVE A DEFENSE

James White Agonistes; or, How I played the apologist easier than a pipe.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 22, 2013 • Apologetics

The Divid­ing Line of May 21, 2013 is all the evi­dence I need  that Dr.* James White is so pre­dis­posed to see lack of intel­li­gence, seri­ous­ness, cred­i­bil­i­ty (fill in your noun of choice) in Catholic apol­o­gists, that he will let him­self be played on like a pipe. No need for Catholic apol­o­gists who engage the good Dr.* White to wait for him to invent straw men. You can hand him one of your own mak­ing: He will grab it, tear it to shreds, stomp upon it, and cack­le in tri­umph. Mean­while, you can pro­ceed with your seri­ous apolo­getic, and he won’t both­er to touch it.

A primer on moral law, with reference to same-sex marriage.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 20, 2013 • LGBT Issues; Moral Theology; Politics

Not even Christo­pher Hitchens believed in moral rel­a­tiv­i­ty. Those who claim to believe in it prob­a­bly mean instead, “I don’t want to be both­ered with what you Chris­tians tell me I ought or ought not do.” But that’s dif­fer­ent. Behind every claim to moral rel­a­tiv­i­ty is some­one mak­ing an excuse, either for him­self or for some­one else. He knows the behav­ior in ques­tion is wrong, but is attached to it, or per­haps does not wish to make the nec­es­sary effort to cor­rect it. Per­haps he feels it would require too much effort. Or per­haps he doesn’t wish to give offense.

Pentecost: To woo back a world’s desire.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 19, 2013 • Liturgical Year

The more I look at the world I find myself in today, the more I am con­vinced that the twen­ty-first-cen­tu­ry Church must become the first-cen­tu­ry Church. We must allow our hearts, our spir­its, our lives to be a cena­cle in which the fire of the Holy Spir­it can ignite and prompt us, if nec­es­sary, to shame and to mar­tyr­dom. For today the Church is con­front­ed with the very same evil it was con­front­ed with in the first cen­tu­ry: pagan­ism. The only dif­fer­ence today is that it is a sec­u­lar, and often a sta­tist, pagan­ism. But it is no less hos­tile to truth.

A counterblast to Dr.* James White and his blithe denial of 48,509 Protestant sects.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 17, 2013 • Apologetics

Accept­ing as giv­en the fig­ure of ca. 33,000 for 2001, I have searched, for some time now, for a sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly accu­rate for­mu­la for deter­min­ing the exact num­ber of Protes­tant sects on any giv­en day in his­to­ry from 1517 for­ward. The Encyclopedia—any ency­clo­pe­dia — can only give esti­mates; but what the Catholic apol­o­gist should desire is pre­ci­sion. That way, when con­front­ed by a rabid Protes­tant, he can be deal­ing in sci­en­tif­ic fact, not dis­putable con­jec­ture. I gave the begin­nings of such a mod­el in my pre­vi­ous arti­cle. How do my esti­mates fare in com­par­i­son to oth­ers?

Ephesians chapter four: Only one Church.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 14, 2013 • Apologetics

Reformed Chris­tians have a very high doc­trine of the Gospel, but not a very high doc­trine of the Church. The rea­son that is trou­bling is because Paul claims no less an exclu­siv­i­ty for the Church than he does for the Gospel. I am used to hear­ing Protes­tant apol­o­gists take a page out of Pla­to and say things like, “There is an invis­i­ble Church which is man­i­fest in local bod­ies.” But St. Paul doesn’t use the plur­al, he uses the sin­gu­lar: body. I nev­er hear Protes­tants say things like, “There is an invis­i­ble Gospel which is man­i­fest in local books.”

A primer on rights, with reference to same-sex marriage.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 13, 2013 • LGBT Issues; Moral Theology; Politics

Of things that exist, some exist by nature, some from oth­er caus­es.” That is the open­ing of Book II of Aristotle’s Physics, and is the begin­ning of all cor­rect rea­son. A tree exists by nature, but a park is made by man. For Aristotle’s “nature,” the Chris­t­ian will sub­sti­tute God; Aquinas improves on Aris­to­tle. Thus of things that exist, some are cre­at­ed by God and some by man. And since they are, in fact, cre­at­ed, it fol­lows that they are cre­at­ed for a pur­pose. It fol­lows, too, that their pur­pose is defined by the mak­er alone. With that in mind, we can turn to Jef­fer­son.

Salon’s Mary Elizabeth Williams lectures the Church on same-sex marriage.

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 11, 2013 • LGBT Issues; Moral Theology; Politics

First we’re going to talk about lan­guage. It behooves any who be hon­est to get the expres­sion “mar­riage equal­i­ty” out of his head. No one believes in any such thing. I doubt very much that Mary Eliz­a­beth Williams believes in it. I would be stu­pe­fied into a coma if she told me she thought it was all good and well if I were to mar­ry two women; or two men; or one woman and one man; or my cat; or a three-year-old child; or six cows; or the exhumed body of King Tut. The rea­son she does not believe I may do these things is because she does not believe in mar­riage equal­i­ty.

Of course you have religious freedom. Except when the State says you don’t. Deconstructing the absolute statism of combox junkie Doug Indeap (if that is his name).

BY: Henry Matthew Alt • May 2, 2013 • Politics

If you go to the search engines and look for “Doug Indeap,” you might have a hard time fig­ur­ing out where or what his prac­tice is. I don’t doubt that he has one. (David Ivester is an envi­ron­men­tal, not a Con­sti­tu­tion­al, lawyer.) But if the pages and pages of returns from Google are any indi­ca­tion, his alter ego Doug Indeap spends a pro­fuse vol­ume of time trolling Catholic and con­ser­v­a­tive blogs and using the com­box­es to instruct us all in his own firm belief in sta­tism and, in par­tic­u­lar, a squeez­ing­ly cramped and claus­tro­pho­bic inter­pre­ta­tion of first amend­ment reli­gious free­dom.

© 2024, SCOTT ERIC ALT • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • POWERED BY WORDPRESS / HOSTGATOR • THEME: NIRMALA