At stake in all this is that Limbo apologists like Kevin Kukla claim that baptism of desire is only for adults on their own behalf; and that parents cannot suppply it vicariously to their children. This is the trick by which they concede baptism of desire while retaining their belief in Limbo. So it would bolster their argument if they could find a pope who condemned a statement about vicarious desire. But what’s odd is that Mr. Kukla cites no source for his claim. He does not give the name of the document in which Pius V supposedly condemned this error.
Read moreDid Pius V condemn Cajetan on the baptism of desire?
BY: Henry Matthew Alt • April 27, 2016 • Apologetics; Church History; Sacraments