won’t get into the specifics of the latest internecine warfare on the Patheos Catholic channel, which began innocently enough with some harmless sexual harrassment from one blogger to another. You can read the details in my friend Mary Pezzulo’s post, entitled “Abuse, Apologetics, and the Heart of Christ.” That’s not all Mary’s post is; it’s really about the scandal of Catholics wounding other Catholics and, in consequence, wounding the heart of Christ. Mary knows how to focus your attention on the real spiritual issues lurking behind what might otherwise seem to be no more than online shittiness.
But I want to take my cue from a story Mary tells about a third of the way through the post:
I don’t know the Quigley family personally. Apparently they are the creators of the Mater Amabilis homeschooling curriculum. The Catholic homeschoolers I know were expressing shock about them on Twitter, and they made an announcement that’s been shared all over. That’s why I’m talking about this publicly, because they announced it publicly and everyone’s already talking, otherwise I wouldn’t think it was appropriate to comment. Mr. Quigley explained that his wife and he are fed up with all the cruelty, coldness, hatred of the poor and tolerance of abuse they’ve witnessed in their Latin Mass Catholic community. It’s made them doubt the efficacy of the sacraments to see so many people who receive the sacraments regularly behave so horribly. For that reason, they’re stepping back from practicing Catholicism, and they don’t know what their new religion will be.
There are over 500 comments on that announcement, and a lot of them are cruel and tone-deaf in the extreme. They are just what you’d think they were: angry people trying to triumph in an argument. People trying to throw syllogisms at a couple who sound heartbroken and probably need some compassion and listening right now. People ranting about Our Lady of Fatima. Everyone wanted to look right. Everyone wanted to win. Everyone wanted to have that perfect answer that would shame and manipulate a family back into the Catholic Church. They weren’t kind. They didn’t listen. They didn’t seem to be thinking at all; they were just spitting triumphant answers at people who were obviously feeling vulnerable and hurt.
In a case like this, a person who makes his living as an apologist might be tempted—by reflex—to go into a long theological argument about ex opere operato and the fact that the sacraments aren’t magic bullets that automatically make everyone virtuous; you must cooperate with grace. But while all that is, technically speaking, true, it’s not what this wounded couple needs to hear right now. They need someone to treat them, not as though they only lack knowledge of the right arguments, and then everything will be better, but as though it’s right to be feeling what they are feeling. They don’t need to be treated as though their faith has somehow failed.
What they need first is to know that not all Catholics are like the ones who hurt them. What they need first is to know that there are Catholics who love them and treat them as though their feelings are okay and matter. It’s not the time to try to win an argument; by doing that, you simply deepen the hurt they already feel.
What Job needed first was friends who would sit down and cry with him, not friends who only wanted to explain to him why he deserved this. When God shows up at the end of the book, the greatest object of his wrath is the apologists.
Other Catholics are among the most horrible people I’ve known in my life. Back in 2016, when I refused to support Trump and started to say that social justice actually is Catholic teaching, I began to have Catholics accuse me of being pro-abortion. They would say that I was losing my faith, or that I was a “cafeteria Catholic.” They told lies about me. I could understand that from a stranger, perhaps, but Catholics I knew in real life—including Catholics who helped me when I was joining the Church, and who ate with me, and had me over to their house—never once contacted me to help them understand my thinking, never once came to my defense. Instead I was ostracized—by people I thought of as real-life friends. You learn to live with those wounds but you never lose them any more than Christ loses his.
I’m only still in the Church because of the grace of God. I’m not still here because of the apologetics or the witness of other Catholics.
I don’t say any of that because I want people to feel sorry for me. My only point is what happens when compassion fails, what happens when your goal is to win a debate, score a point, and be right, rather than to love someone. If I possess all apologetic answers but have not love I. Am. Nothing.
C.S. Lewis once composed this prayer for apologists:
From all my lame defeats and oh! much more
From all the victories that I seemed to score;
From cleverness shot forth on Thy behalf
At which, while angels weep, the audience laugh;
From all my proofs of Thy divinity,
Thou, who wouldst give no sign, deliver me.
Thoughts are but coins. Let me not trust, instead
Of Thee, their thin-worn image of Thy head.
From all my thoughts, even from my thoughts of Thee,
O thou fair Silence, fall, and set me free.
Lord of the narrow gate and the needle’s eye,
Take from me all my trumpery lest die. [Pun not intended.]
When someone is wounded—whether it’s a parent who lost a child and blames God, or someone who’s been sexually abused and is struggling to figure out who they are, or someone who’s been falsely accused by people he knew—the last thing they are looking for is the Right Answers. And certainly they’re not looking to be interrogated by someone who wants to know if they’re still following all the moral laws or believe all the right doctrines. There are times when this kind of response only makes their hurt worse. They want love.
Apologetics has an important place, but this is what God revealed to Julian of Norwich:
I saw that God is to us everything which is good and comforting for our help. God is our clothing, who wraps and enfolds us for love, embraces us and shelters us, surrounds us for love, which is so tender that God may never desert us. And so in this sight I saw that God is everything which is good, as I understand.
And in this God showed me something small, no bigger than a hazelnut, lying in the palm of my hand. It seemed to me as round as a ball. I gazed at it and thought, ‘What can this be?’ The answer came thus, ‘It is everything that is made.’ I marveled how this could be, for it was so small it seemed it might fall suddenly into nothingness. Then I heard the answer, ‘It lasts, and ever shall last, because God loves it. All things have their being in this way by the grace of God.’
In this little thing I saw three properties. The first is that God made it, the second is that God loves it, the third is that God preserves it. But what did I see in it? It is that God is the creator and protector and the lover. For until I am substantially united to God, I can never have perfect rest or true happiness, until, that is, I am so attached to God that there can be no created thing between my God and me.
Answers have an important place, but God is not going to ask us on the last day whether we gave our brother and our sister a good answer, or how many apologetics “papers” we wrote. He’s going to ask whether we loved them with the love of Christ.
Discover more from To Give a Defense
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.